Normally, catching up on an old movie would be summarized in a quick paragraph for a Shorties entry. Today's movie, however, has a lot of backstory on this blog. 1950 is a banner year for cinema here at the Slice of Lime. I'm often talking about how All About Eve is essentially the perfect movie. I checked in on Born Yesterday in order to understand how Judy Holliday might have deserved the Oscar she won that year. Conclusion: She didn't.
In the comments on that entry, my friend Kevin and I discussed the difficulty of obtaining a copy of Caged, which he recommended. Guess what obstacle just got overcome! Netflix finally put it on their catalog, and I immediately jumped on board, excited to see how Eleanor Parker stacked up against the other Academy Award nominees of that year. Imagine my surprise at finding her performance the least interesting thing about this incredibly remarkable movie.
Caged tells the story of Marie Allen (Parker), a woman sent to prison for being an accessory to a $40 robbery her husband died committing. She is wide-eyed and innocent; her part in the crime almost totally involuntary. She's thrown in with hardened criminals and a viciously cruel matron who abuses her when Marie can't pony up the cash for favors. She makes friends, as well, and does her best to fight the temptations that are offered to her in exchange for help with the parole board or post-prison employment. Spoiler alert for a 65-year-old movie: She gives in, becomes a hard, brittle person, and although she is eventually released, it's implied that she won't be out for long.
The movie serves as a pretty open criticism of American prisons, and how they fail the people they claim to want to rehabilitate. Agnes Moorehead plays the warden, the sole character who treats the inmates as human beings, and who watches helplessly as the system chews them up. But that's just the surface story, and as I alluded to above, Marie struck me as a nucleus for the more noteworthy stories orbiting around her.
Hope Emerson portrays the sinister matron, who takes delight in physically and psychologically torturing her charges. The inmates are a varied bunch as well, from the brittle queen bee who runs a jailhouse syndicate, to the society woman who can't believe that someone of her breeding is in prison, to a girl whose tenuous hold on hope snaps when her assured parole falls through. Once these women start interacting, no amount of hysterical speeches or pregnancy can make Marie the focus of my attention; I just want to spend the whole movie with Kitty Stark.
Another aspect of the movie worth mentioning is its thinly-veiled moralizing about homosexuality. Since I'd never seen this movie before, I didn't recognize it when it was specifically referenced in the sad and important documentary The Celluloid Closet. In this movie, as in many movies of the era, lesbianism is a horrible curse that befalls hard-hearted women who come to decidedly unpleasant ends. I'm not specifically knocking this film for this message that nice girls better watch themselves, lest they be targeted by such women - just pointing it out as an artifact of the times.
Overall, it's a pretty ripping movie that I really enjoyed. The message never crosses over into preachy sermons. The prison action is never played for saucy exploitation. And the downbeat ending must have been quite a shock to audiences at the time, who were more used to seeing pretty young ladies tie up all their problems in a neat little bow by the end credits.
Certain years are considered benchmarks in the history of movies. 1929. 1999. After watching this, I think it's pretty settled that 1950 earns a place on the list as well.
Caged: A-
Blackened Tongues and the Christmas Calamity
Four Courses Podcast - Episode 12
It's absolutely incredible to me that we're coming up on an entire year since my friend Kyle and I launched the Four Courses podcast. We all know that time flies, but I expected it to fly at the speed of an airplane, not the speed of a laser beam. My obsession with food and cooking continues unabated, so if you haven't downloaded it already, here is Episode 12, submitted for your approval.
Topics include the cozy atmosphere of Elaia, the best drinks for winding down at the end of the evening, the food-related disasters that have befallen us over the years, and a spirited debate over restaurants with a policy of not accepting reservations. We close out the year by revisiting the year's food resolutions to see how well we did at keeping our promises. I hope you enjoy it, and feel free to drop a line to fourcoursespodcast@gmail.com with any questions, comments, feedback, or suggestions!
It's absolutely incredible to me that we're coming up on an entire year since my friend Kyle and I launched the Four Courses podcast. We all know that time flies, but I expected it to fly at the speed of an airplane, not the speed of a laser beam. My obsession with food and cooking continues unabated, so if you haven't downloaded it already, here is Episode 12, submitted for your approval.
Topics include the cozy atmosphere of Elaia, the best drinks for winding down at the end of the evening, the food-related disasters that have befallen us over the years, and a spirited debate over restaurants with a policy of not accepting reservations. We close out the year by revisiting the year's food resolutions to see how well we did at keeping our promises. I hope you enjoy it, and feel free to drop a line to fourcoursespodcast@gmail.com with any questions, comments, feedback, or suggestions!
The State of the Art: Movies 2014
I need to start this year's cinematic State of the Art with some caveats and some apologies. I really fell down on the job in 2014, movie-wise. Check out the stats in years past. This year, I'm at a lower overall number (50 movies) and a lower number of same-year releases (19 of the 50). That means it's held at a pretty steady percentage of new-to-overall (38%), but there's a smaller pool of movies to draw from.
Also, I've noticed that the grades look kind of wonky, due to my usual system of partially grading on a meets/exceeds/doesn't live up to expectations scale. That means that if a heavily-praised prestige picture was good, but didn't strike me as wonderful as people said, it likely didn't get as high a grade as a comic book movie that I expected to be kind of dumb, but wound up being more entertaining and technically proficient than it could have been. I don't mean to suggest that Captain America: Winter Solider is a towering cinematic achievement, while Birdman was crap.
And finally, since the top five all have to be same-year releases, movies that I like more than those on the list might fall through the cracks, due purely to timing. Note that Her has the highest rating I've given a movie in a long time, but since I saw it this year, it doesn't appear on either the top five of 2013 or 2014.
So, let's get to that top five, along with a pledge that I'll try to embrace a wider range of movies next year:
#1: Guardians of the Galaxy
What I Said: I'm reaching for things to nitpick, and am not really coming up with anything. This was pretty much the perfect summer movie experience, and assuming Marvel wants to capture lightning in a bottle like this again, they'll have their work cut out of them.
#2: Boyhood
What I Said: As a cinematic achievement, this is flawless. Assembling a movie with a single cast/crew over the course of twelve years is no mean feat, just in the technical sense. There are also any number of methods Linklater could have used to incorporate the aspect of passing time into a fictional narrative, and he avoids a lot of clumsy traps. There are no obvious dissolves between ages. There are no "One Year Later" subtitles. There's no omniscient narrator explaining what's happening. There's no obvious foreshadowing in the beginning that magically pays off in the end. There is no AND THEN THIS HUGE THING HAPPENED THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING event that never happens to actual people. The movie just flows from scene to scene, just like life.
#3: X-Men: Days of Future Past
What I Said: It's not just an excuse to watch Wolverine slash at stuff and Magneto levitate some bullets. As a result, it's a fantastic flick, where the verbal fights are as compelling as the super-powered ones. The cast certainly helps. The elder versions of Xavier and Magneto (Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen) are well-matched by their younger selves (James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender). Jennifer Lawrence is an emotionally powerful Mystique. Peter Dinklage is a superb antagonist. Each of the secondary characters gets a chance to show off as well, and actually use their powers in concert with each other, demonstrating cooperation that not enough team movies display. And if you're just looking for pure fun, the Quicksilver setpiece in the middle of the movie is one of the most amazing scenes I've seen in a long time.
#4: Captain America: The Winter Soldier
What I Said: Captain America is not the Broody Loner Hero that we've been seeing a lot of lately. He wants to interact with society, and has a much stronger connection to the people around him than Batman or Superman has in a long time. Still, the real standouts in this movie are Johansson and Mackie, both of whom take roles that could easily come off as one-note and flesh them out into relatable, sympathetic characters. Samuel L. Jackson and Robert Redford also turn into some great supporting performances.
#5: Gone Girl
What I Said: As far as performances go, most special mentions have to go to the female contingent. Rosamund Pike gives Amy a cool, competent air, but still conveys the emotion bubbling underneath. Carrie Coon is Nick's twin sister who does her damndest to be supportive, even as her brother makes what she feels are all the wrong decisions. Kim Dickens is marvelously understated, but forceful as a detective trying to unravel the mystery of Amy's disappearance. And hey, let's not leave out Missi Pyle, who plays a Nancy Grace surrogate as nasty and irresponsible as you could ever want.
Comic book movies are over-represented, so I guess I was just looking for some fun this year. Maybe next year I'll revert to indie dramas. Or maybe not! Let's go to the full year's list:
2014 Movies
Guardians of the Galaxy (A)
Boyhood (A-)
X-Men: Days of Future Past (A-)
Captain America: Winter Soldier (A-)
Gone Girl (B+)
The Lego Movie (B+)
Edge of Tomorrow (B+)
The Babadook (B+)
Grand Piano (B+)
The Tale of Princess Kaguya (B)
The Grand Budapest Hotel (B)
How to Train Your Dragon 2 (B)
Big Hero 6 (B)
The Skeleton Twins (B)
Into the Woods (B/C+)
Birdman (B-)
Maleficent (B-)
The Boxtrolls (B-)
Godzilla (C+)
It seems that sticking to more lighthearted fare worked pretty well, as 47% of the movies rated a B+ or higher, and only a single new release wound up disappointing me. Still, I feel like not seeing movies like Whiplash or Foxcatcher yet means I haven't done my "homework", if that makes any sense. So how do the 2014 films fit into the entire year of movie watching? Let's find out!
Her (2013) (A+)
Short Term 12 (2013) (A)
Guardians of the Galaxy (A)
Boyhood (A-)
X-Men: Days of Future Past (A-)
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (A-)
Gone Girl (B+)
The Lego Movie (B+)
Edge of Tomorrow (B+)
The Babadook (B+)
Captain Phillips (2013) (B+)
The Last of Sheila (1973) (B+)
Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs 2 (2013) (B+)
Side Effects (2013) (B+)
The Warriors (1979) (B+)
Hot Water (1924) (B+)
Night of the Comet (1984) (B+)
Grand Piano (B+)
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) (B)
The Tale of Princess Kaguya (B)
The Grand Budapest Hotel (B)
How to Train Your Dragon 2 (B)
Big Hero 6 (B)
The Skeleton Twins (B)
Populaire (2012) (B)
Urbanized (2011) (B)
Kings of Pastry (2009) (B)
Assault on Precinct 13 (1976) (B)
Public Speaking (2010) (B)
Elaine Stritch: Shoot Me (2013) (B)
Into the Woods (B/C+)
White House Down (2013) (B)
Trollhunter (2010) (B)
Birdman (B-)
American Hustle (2013) (B-)
The Ides of March (2011) B-
Anna Karenina (2012) (B-)
Maleficent (B-)
The Boxtrolls (B-)
Exam (2009) (B-)
Penelope (2006) (B-)
August: Osage County (2013) (C+)
Wanderlust (2012) (C+)
A.C.O.D. (2013) (C+)
Godzilla (C+)
Rango (2011) (C+)
Hamlet 2 (2008) (C+)
Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012) (C)
It's a Disaster (2012) (C)
The Big Wedding (2013) (C-)
Also, I've noticed that the grades look kind of wonky, due to my usual system of partially grading on a meets/exceeds/doesn't live up to expectations scale. That means that if a heavily-praised prestige picture was good, but didn't strike me as wonderful as people said, it likely didn't get as high a grade as a comic book movie that I expected to be kind of dumb, but wound up being more entertaining and technically proficient than it could have been. I don't mean to suggest that Captain America: Winter Solider is a towering cinematic achievement, while Birdman was crap.
And finally, since the top five all have to be same-year releases, movies that I like more than those on the list might fall through the cracks, due purely to timing. Note that Her has the highest rating I've given a movie in a long time, but since I saw it this year, it doesn't appear on either the top five of 2013 or 2014.
So, let's get to that top five, along with a pledge that I'll try to embrace a wider range of movies next year:
#1: Guardians of the Galaxy
What I Said: I'm reaching for things to nitpick, and am not really coming up with anything. This was pretty much the perfect summer movie experience, and assuming Marvel wants to capture lightning in a bottle like this again, they'll have their work cut out of them.
#2: Boyhood
What I Said: As a cinematic achievement, this is flawless. Assembling a movie with a single cast/crew over the course of twelve years is no mean feat, just in the technical sense. There are also any number of methods Linklater could have used to incorporate the aspect of passing time into a fictional narrative, and he avoids a lot of clumsy traps. There are no obvious dissolves between ages. There are no "One Year Later" subtitles. There's no omniscient narrator explaining what's happening. There's no obvious foreshadowing in the beginning that magically pays off in the end. There is no AND THEN THIS HUGE THING HAPPENED THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING event that never happens to actual people. The movie just flows from scene to scene, just like life.
#3: X-Men: Days of Future Past
What I Said: It's not just an excuse to watch Wolverine slash at stuff and Magneto levitate some bullets. As a result, it's a fantastic flick, where the verbal fights are as compelling as the super-powered ones. The cast certainly helps. The elder versions of Xavier and Magneto (Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen) are well-matched by their younger selves (James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender). Jennifer Lawrence is an emotionally powerful Mystique. Peter Dinklage is a superb antagonist. Each of the secondary characters gets a chance to show off as well, and actually use their powers in concert with each other, demonstrating cooperation that not enough team movies display. And if you're just looking for pure fun, the Quicksilver setpiece in the middle of the movie is one of the most amazing scenes I've seen in a long time.
#4: Captain America: The Winter Soldier
What I Said: Captain America is not the Broody Loner Hero that we've been seeing a lot of lately. He wants to interact with society, and has a much stronger connection to the people around him than Batman or Superman has in a long time. Still, the real standouts in this movie are Johansson and Mackie, both of whom take roles that could easily come off as one-note and flesh them out into relatable, sympathetic characters. Samuel L. Jackson and Robert Redford also turn into some great supporting performances.
#5: Gone Girl
What I Said: As far as performances go, most special mentions have to go to the female contingent. Rosamund Pike gives Amy a cool, competent air, but still conveys the emotion bubbling underneath. Carrie Coon is Nick's twin sister who does her damndest to be supportive, even as her brother makes what she feels are all the wrong decisions. Kim Dickens is marvelously understated, but forceful as a detective trying to unravel the mystery of Amy's disappearance. And hey, let's not leave out Missi Pyle, who plays a Nancy Grace surrogate as nasty and irresponsible as you could ever want.
Comic book movies are over-represented, so I guess I was just looking for some fun this year. Maybe next year I'll revert to indie dramas. Or maybe not! Let's go to the full year's list:
2014 Movies
Guardians of the Galaxy (A)
Boyhood (A-)
X-Men: Days of Future Past (A-)
Captain America: Winter Soldier (A-)
Gone Girl (B+)
The Lego Movie (B+)
Edge of Tomorrow (B+)
The Babadook (B+)
Grand Piano (B+)
The Tale of Princess Kaguya (B)
The Grand Budapest Hotel (B)
How to Train Your Dragon 2 (B)
Big Hero 6 (B)
The Skeleton Twins (B)
Into the Woods (B/C+)
Birdman (B-)
Maleficent (B-)
The Boxtrolls (B-)
Godzilla (C+)
It seems that sticking to more lighthearted fare worked pretty well, as 47% of the movies rated a B+ or higher, and only a single new release wound up disappointing me. Still, I feel like not seeing movies like Whiplash or Foxcatcher yet means I haven't done my "homework", if that makes any sense. So how do the 2014 films fit into the entire year of movie watching? Let's find out!
Her (2013) (A+)
Short Term 12 (2013) (A)
Guardians of the Galaxy (A)
Boyhood (A-)
X-Men: Days of Future Past (A-)
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (A-)
Gone Girl (B+)
The Lego Movie (B+)
Edge of Tomorrow (B+)
The Babadook (B+)
Captain Phillips (2013) (B+)
The Last of Sheila (1973) (B+)
Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs 2 (2013) (B+)
Side Effects (2013) (B+)
The Warriors (1979) (B+)
Hot Water (1924) (B+)
Night of the Comet (1984) (B+)
Grand Piano (B+)
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) (B)
The Tale of Princess Kaguya (B)
The Grand Budapest Hotel (B)
How to Train Your Dragon 2 (B)
Big Hero 6 (B)
The Skeleton Twins (B)
Populaire (2012) (B)
Urbanized (2011) (B)
Kings of Pastry (2009) (B)
Assault on Precinct 13 (1976) (B)
Public Speaking (2010) (B)
Elaine Stritch: Shoot Me (2013) (B)
Into the Woods (B/C+)
White House Down (2013) (B)
Trollhunter (2010) (B)
Birdman (B-)
American Hustle (2013) (B-)
The Ides of March (2011) B-
Anna Karenina (2012) (B-)
Maleficent (B-)
The Boxtrolls (B-)
Exam (2009) (B-)
Penelope (2006) (B-)
August: Osage County (2013) (C+)
Wanderlust (2012) (C+)
A.C.O.D. (2013) (C+)
Godzilla (C+)
Rango (2011) (C+)
Hamlet 2 (2008) (C+)
Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012) (C)
It's a Disaster (2012) (C)
The Big Wedding (2013) (C-)
Shorties #15
Now that the year is almost over, I'd better get to wedging in blurbs about the things I've just wrapped up, if only so they can be included in the State of the Art posts. And what's the quickest way to do that? Shorties!
#1: The Ides of March: In this 2011 film, Ryan Gosling plays a campaign manager for George Clooney, portraying a politician attempting to win the Democratic presidential nomination. All of his talking points are slick and broadly appealing to us bleeding heart liberals, but there are dirty little secrets bubbling beneath the surface. When Gosling discovers that winning and ideals cannot always go hand-in-hand, he has to make some pretty tough choices. It's a well-acted movie, but often trades in cliche. And on a personal note, I really detest it when movies or TV depict arguments about/decisions regarding abortion that don't have the guts to ever even mutter the word aloud. (Grade: B-)
#2: Mr. Mercedes: I was surprised that I was able to get my hands on Stephen King's new book from the library so quickly. This story concerns a retired detective who sets aside his suicidal tendencies in an effort to close a case where the perpetrator of a heinous hit-and-run mass murder got away. Perspectives shift between the hero and the villain so that we can see what both of them are up to. There are no supernatural baddies here; all the horrors stems from places that are distressingly human. It's a fairly mundane thriller, and weirdly, it's the first book in a trilogy about the protagonist, who isn't a very interesting character. It was a decent read that moved along at a good clip, though, and that's all I was expecting from it. (Grade: B)
#3: Side Effects: Stephen Soderbergh tends to make movies that I find fascinating, but sometimes it takes me a while to get around to seeing them. This 2013 movie is no exception, which worked out well, since I enjoyed it more on my couch than I think I would have in the theater. On the surface, it's a psychological thriller about a murder and just how culpable the perpetrator is, given that she's on an experimental course of anti-depressants. Did she mean to do it? Does she even remember it? Is it her psychiatrist's fault? Is she playing the system? It's a great premise, and the execution is pulled off meticulously. Even as the general story is unfolding, the movie also serves as a pretty sharp satire of Americans' over-reliance on pill popping to solve all their problems. The final act is a little too neat and tidy, given the mess that preceded it, but overall, it's a very well-done movie. (Grade: B+)
#4: Dragon Age: Inquisition: This game franchise has had a bumpy history. The first entry (Dragon Age: Origins) ranks as one of my favorite games of all time. The second (Dragon Age II) was the biggest disappointment of the year. Now that I'm several hours into this third entry, I can confidently say that Dragon Age is back, baby! My grade is based purely on gameplay, so I'm not docking any points for the bugs, of which there are too many. I'm not happy about the crashes and glitches, of course, but they're fixable. They're not intrinsic to the game. This game almost seems like a direct response to the complaints about Dragon Age II. Don't like the poorly-written companion scenes? Great, here are nine companions who all have much more intricate backstories, desires, wishes, and triggers. Tired of the same cave over and over and over again? Great, let's make the world breathtakingly gigantic, with each zone having its own citizens, atmosphere, and personality. This game is gorgeous, funny, romantic, sad, and above all else...fun. And I'm not even halfway done. (Grade: A)
#5: Book of Ages: The Life and Opinions of Jane Franklin: If you're not careful, writing about history can be too dry. I mean, check out one of the only two books that I couldn't even get through this year. Simple recitations of names and dates gets old (no pun intended). So I was pleased by Jill Lepore's 2013 book, even as it admitted to being about a woman whose only claim to fame was being Benjamin Franklin's kid sister. Jane Franklin wasn't an author (she could barely spell). She didn't advise her brother on matters of policy. She didn't, in fact, do much of anything except make soap and babies. But that's precisely what's so interesting about the book; plenty has been written about our forefathers, but not much about the lives of the people for whom those forefathers were crafting a new country. This book runs on the parallel tracks of a towering giant in American history and a simple housewife, who happened to adore each other. Lepore's source material is very thin, but she's able to build on it, creating a pretty lifelike portrait of a woman who remains mostly anonymous. (Grade: B)
#1: The Ides of March: In this 2011 film, Ryan Gosling plays a campaign manager for George Clooney, portraying a politician attempting to win the Democratic presidential nomination. All of his talking points are slick and broadly appealing to us bleeding heart liberals, but there are dirty little secrets bubbling beneath the surface. When Gosling discovers that winning and ideals cannot always go hand-in-hand, he has to make some pretty tough choices. It's a well-acted movie, but often trades in cliche. And on a personal note, I really detest it when movies or TV depict arguments about/decisions regarding abortion that don't have the guts to ever even mutter the word aloud. (Grade: B-)
#2: Mr. Mercedes: I was surprised that I was able to get my hands on Stephen King's new book from the library so quickly. This story concerns a retired detective who sets aside his suicidal tendencies in an effort to close a case where the perpetrator of a heinous hit-and-run mass murder got away. Perspectives shift between the hero and the villain so that we can see what both of them are up to. There are no supernatural baddies here; all the horrors stems from places that are distressingly human. It's a fairly mundane thriller, and weirdly, it's the first book in a trilogy about the protagonist, who isn't a very interesting character. It was a decent read that moved along at a good clip, though, and that's all I was expecting from it. (Grade: B)
#3: Side Effects: Stephen Soderbergh tends to make movies that I find fascinating, but sometimes it takes me a while to get around to seeing them. This 2013 movie is no exception, which worked out well, since I enjoyed it more on my couch than I think I would have in the theater. On the surface, it's a psychological thriller about a murder and just how culpable the perpetrator is, given that she's on an experimental course of anti-depressants. Did she mean to do it? Does she even remember it? Is it her psychiatrist's fault? Is she playing the system? It's a great premise, and the execution is pulled off meticulously. Even as the general story is unfolding, the movie also serves as a pretty sharp satire of Americans' over-reliance on pill popping to solve all their problems. The final act is a little too neat and tidy, given the mess that preceded it, but overall, it's a very well-done movie. (Grade: B+)
#4: Dragon Age: Inquisition: This game franchise has had a bumpy history. The first entry (Dragon Age: Origins) ranks as one of my favorite games of all time. The second (Dragon Age II) was the biggest disappointment of the year. Now that I'm several hours into this third entry, I can confidently say that Dragon Age is back, baby! My grade is based purely on gameplay, so I'm not docking any points for the bugs, of which there are too many. I'm not happy about the crashes and glitches, of course, but they're fixable. They're not intrinsic to the game. This game almost seems like a direct response to the complaints about Dragon Age II. Don't like the poorly-written companion scenes? Great, here are nine companions who all have much more intricate backstories, desires, wishes, and triggers. Tired of the same cave over and over and over again? Great, let's make the world breathtakingly gigantic, with each zone having its own citizens, atmosphere, and personality. This game is gorgeous, funny, romantic, sad, and above all else...fun. And I'm not even halfway done. (Grade: A)
#5: Book of Ages: The Life and Opinions of Jane Franklin: If you're not careful, writing about history can be too dry. I mean, check out one of the only two books that I couldn't even get through this year. Simple recitations of names and dates gets old (no pun intended). So I was pleased by Jill Lepore's 2013 book, even as it admitted to being about a woman whose only claim to fame was being Benjamin Franklin's kid sister. Jane Franklin wasn't an author (she could barely spell). She didn't advise her brother on matters of policy. She didn't, in fact, do much of anything except make soap and babies. But that's precisely what's so interesting about the book; plenty has been written about our forefathers, but not much about the lives of the people for whom those forefathers were crafting a new country. This book runs on the parallel tracks of a towering giant in American history and a simple housewife, who happened to adore each other. Lepore's source material is very thin, but she's able to build on it, creating a pretty lifelike portrait of a woman who remains mostly anonymous. (Grade: B)
Tears For Fears
As I've recently mentioned, the race is on to cram in a bunch of movies before the year ends. To that end, one of the afternoons this weekend was devoted to chicken strips and a double feature at a friend's house. Now there's an enjoyable combo!
The first movie was one the few horror films I've allowed myself to see lately. I allowed myself to be seduced by The Babadook for several reasons. One: All the critical reviewers I often read and trust were talking it up as being much more than just an everyday screamer. Two: I had been assured that except for brief flashes, the gore level wouldn't be anything I couldn't handle. Three: It stars Essie Davis, an actress I'm doing cartwheels over these days. After making sure I had a handy blanket to hide my face when necessary, we dove in.
It's a fascinating movie, in more ways than one. The reviewers were right: This isn't just a jump-scare movie where monsters leap out and yell "Boo!". It's a lot deeper than that. Davis stars as a single mother with a young, troubled son. Her husband was killed in a car accident that occurred when he was driving her to the delivery room, so of course, her feelings about her kid are all wrapped up in the grief and loss surrounding her husband. It doesn't help that he's a real handful, so her situation is worsened by the complicated feelings of not really liking him.
When she reads a pop-up book ostensibly written for children to her son, they discover that it describes a presence known as Mr. Babadook, who will consume their entire lives if they allow him in. It doesn't take long for the household to devolve into hysteria, but is Mr. Babadook real, or are the events that seem supernatural just a manifestation of loneliness, unhappiness, and sleep deprivation? It's a tense, exciting movie, and one of the rare thrillers that offers a good scare without having to resort to disgusting shock effects.
As soon as the end credits rolled, we jumped straight into Wes Anderson's latest movie, The Grand Budapest Hotel. It's gotten stellar reviews, but as with the stellar reviews for Birdman, I find the gushing praise a little overdone. That's not to say I disliked it, though; as with a lot of Anderson's movies, I found it gorgeous in its visuals, and pretty charming to boot.
The story charts the history of the titular hotel and its most devoted concierge, as told by his protege, a young refugee serving as lobby boy. Ralph Fiennes is the one aspect that has not been over-praised; he is absolutely incredible as the concierge whose devotion to service and professionalism earns him valuable friendships worldwide. A battle over a dowager's bequeathment and the threat of world war sends them on a series of adventures. It's a clever movie, and for those who don't enjoy the usual twee nature of Anderson's movies, this one is a lot more straightforward. It didn't quite reach the heights that last year's Moonrise Kingdom did for me, but I will admit that it was very fun and very pretty.
The Babadook: B+
The Grand Budapest Hotel: B
The first movie was one the few horror films I've allowed myself to see lately. I allowed myself to be seduced by The Babadook for several reasons. One: All the critical reviewers I often read and trust were talking it up as being much more than just an everyday screamer. Two: I had been assured that except for brief flashes, the gore level wouldn't be anything I couldn't handle. Three: It stars Essie Davis, an actress I'm doing cartwheels over these days. After making sure I had a handy blanket to hide my face when necessary, we dove in.
It's a fascinating movie, in more ways than one. The reviewers were right: This isn't just a jump-scare movie where monsters leap out and yell "Boo!". It's a lot deeper than that. Davis stars as a single mother with a young, troubled son. Her husband was killed in a car accident that occurred when he was driving her to the delivery room, so of course, her feelings about her kid are all wrapped up in the grief and loss surrounding her husband. It doesn't help that he's a real handful, so her situation is worsened by the complicated feelings of not really liking him.
When she reads a pop-up book ostensibly written for children to her son, they discover that it describes a presence known as Mr. Babadook, who will consume their entire lives if they allow him in. It doesn't take long for the household to devolve into hysteria, but is Mr. Babadook real, or are the events that seem supernatural just a manifestation of loneliness, unhappiness, and sleep deprivation? It's a tense, exciting movie, and one of the rare thrillers that offers a good scare without having to resort to disgusting shock effects.
As soon as the end credits rolled, we jumped straight into Wes Anderson's latest movie, The Grand Budapest Hotel. It's gotten stellar reviews, but as with the stellar reviews for Birdman, I find the gushing praise a little overdone. That's not to say I disliked it, though; as with a lot of Anderson's movies, I found it gorgeous in its visuals, and pretty charming to boot.
The story charts the history of the titular hotel and its most devoted concierge, as told by his protege, a young refugee serving as lobby boy. Ralph Fiennes is the one aspect that has not been over-praised; he is absolutely incredible as the concierge whose devotion to service and professionalism earns him valuable friendships worldwide. A battle over a dowager's bequeathment and the threat of world war sends them on a series of adventures. It's a clever movie, and for those who don't enjoy the usual twee nature of Anderson's movies, this one is a lot more straightforward. It didn't quite reach the heights that last year's Moonrise Kingdom did for me, but I will admit that it was very fun and very pretty.
The Babadook: B+
The Grand Budapest Hotel: B
I Wish...
Once upon a time...
Disney made an adaptation of a musical you've either never heard of, or at least aren't very familiar with. It's released on Christmas Day with a family-friendly rating and is packed to the rafters with bankable movie stars and beloved fairy tale characters. I'm speaking of Into the Woods, the long-awaited adaptation of Stephen Sondheim's 1986 musical.
It interweaves the stories of Little Red Riding Hood, Jack (of beanstalk fame), Cinderella, and Rapunzel. They're off in their separate stories until a childless couple (a baker and his wife) pull everyone together in their quest to undo a spell put on them by a neighboring witch. The music and the orchestrations are lovely, and all of the actors are excellent at putting their own twisty spin on classic archetypes. Meryl Streep's witch may be nasty, but she loves her daughter. Little Red Riding Hood is more interested in cinnamon rolls than her granny's health.
It's a very pretty movie (and there's no way a theater production can achieve the same visual things that a movie can), and though things take a scary turn midway through, it never gets too intense. For newbies (especially those with kids), it's a pretty entertaining way to spend a part of your holiday season. The characters go well beyond their original stories, and all learn valuable lessons about their place in the world and the interconnectedness of all people.
And they all lived happily ever after.
Into the Woods: B
Once upon a time...
Disney made an adaptation of a musical you know by heart, and while it was competent (a feat in itself, given what a shitshow the rumors suggested it would be), it doesn't come anywhere near achieving what the source material does, and in the transition, winds up as a pretty disappointing final product.
Now, I'm not saying that everything in the play had to find its way into the movie; I'm not against cuts and changes. It's disappointing that the reprise of "Agony" is gone, but I don't much care that the narrator/old man is practically eliminated or that Jack doesn't sing goodbye to his cow anymore. But I do care when the underlying themes of the source material are discarded or mangled. This is a fully Disneyfied movie, which means it's done away with the parts of Into the Woods which satirizes, well, the Disneyfication of fairy tales.
Johnny Depp is pretty terrible as the wolf, hamming all the character's subtext into full on text for a frankly-too-young Little Red Riding Hood. The songs have been slowed down. The charm of the interweaving storylines of the opening song is lost to quick cuts between scenes. Rapunzel, far from dying, simply walks off the screen two-thirds of the way through and is never seen again.
Though Emily Blunt is terrific (as she always is) as the Baker's Wife, and Chris Pine is a wonderfully smarmy Prince Charming, the adaptation and directorial choices are hampered by the PG rating, and just don't go far enough to make this very worthwhile for fans of the show. I've spent years wishing for Into the Woods to be made into a big spectacle of a movie. And as the musical admonishes, you should be careful what you wish for, lest you get it.
Into the Woods: C+
Disney made an adaptation of a musical you've either never heard of, or at least aren't very familiar with. It's released on Christmas Day with a family-friendly rating and is packed to the rafters with bankable movie stars and beloved fairy tale characters. I'm speaking of Into the Woods, the long-awaited adaptation of Stephen Sondheim's 1986 musical.
It interweaves the stories of Little Red Riding Hood, Jack (of beanstalk fame), Cinderella, and Rapunzel. They're off in their separate stories until a childless couple (a baker and his wife) pull everyone together in their quest to undo a spell put on them by a neighboring witch. The music and the orchestrations are lovely, and all of the actors are excellent at putting their own twisty spin on classic archetypes. Meryl Streep's witch may be nasty, but she loves her daughter. Little Red Riding Hood is more interested in cinnamon rolls than her granny's health.
It's a very pretty movie (and there's no way a theater production can achieve the same visual things that a movie can), and though things take a scary turn midway through, it never gets too intense. For newbies (especially those with kids), it's a pretty entertaining way to spend a part of your holiday season. The characters go well beyond their original stories, and all learn valuable lessons about their place in the world and the interconnectedness of all people.
And they all lived happily ever after.
Into the Woods: B
Once upon a time...
Disney made an adaptation of a musical you know by heart, and while it was competent (a feat in itself, given what a shitshow the rumors suggested it would be), it doesn't come anywhere near achieving what the source material does, and in the transition, winds up as a pretty disappointing final product.
Now, I'm not saying that everything in the play had to find its way into the movie; I'm not against cuts and changes. It's disappointing that the reprise of "Agony" is gone, but I don't much care that the narrator/old man is practically eliminated or that Jack doesn't sing goodbye to his cow anymore. But I do care when the underlying themes of the source material are discarded or mangled. This is a fully Disneyfied movie, which means it's done away with the parts of Into the Woods which satirizes, well, the Disneyfication of fairy tales.
Johnny Depp is pretty terrible as the wolf, hamming all the character's subtext into full on text for a frankly-too-young Little Red Riding Hood. The songs have been slowed down. The charm of the interweaving storylines of the opening song is lost to quick cuts between scenes. Rapunzel, far from dying, simply walks off the screen two-thirds of the way through and is never seen again.
Though Emily Blunt is terrific (as she always is) as the Baker's Wife, and Chris Pine is a wonderfully smarmy Prince Charming, the adaptation and directorial choices are hampered by the PG rating, and just don't go far enough to make this very worthwhile for fans of the show. I've spent years wishing for Into the Woods to be made into a big spectacle of a movie. And as the musical admonishes, you should be careful what you wish for, lest you get it.
Into the Woods: C+
The State of the Art: Books 2014
Last year, I was amazed and delighted to note that not only was there an increase in the number of books I was able to read, but that the average quality of books rose as well. What a magical time it was. This year, I'm still amazed, but not as delighted. I don't know how I did it, but I somehow managed to put away 36 books (to last year's 28), and as always, that doesn't even include books I often re-read, or stray things like childhood favorites I revisited to see how they held up.
Thirty-six doesn't sound like a lot, but for someone who also consumes a lot of movies, TV, games, and podcasts, averaging three books a month isn't half-bad! Unfortunately, though the number of books went up, the average quality went down. There were definitely some bright spots this year, of course, which we'll get to in a moment. But if we're looking at 2014 as a whole, the books that stand out are fewer and farther between. Note that last year, 13 of the 28 books ranked a B+ or higher (46%). This year, 10 of the 36 managed to make the cut (28%). Ouch.
But hey, let's get to some good news! In looking at my list of books, it becomes increasingly clear how much I enjoy a well-executed gimmick. I wouldn't call myself a huge overall fan of science fiction or fantasy, but books that manage to straddle the line between those and realism always seem to rise to the top. It's our world, but giant bugs are attacking. It's our world, but a hidden Amazon tribe needs our help. It's our world, but a woman keeps looping through her life. If 2013 was the Year of the Short Story, 2014 is the Year of the Parallel Universe. So let's crawl through the looking glass, and talk about which of those worlds are worth the visit.
#1: Grasshopper Jungle - Andrew Smith
What I Said: If this book had just been about a horny teenaged boy trying to come to grips with his raging hormones, that would have been cool. If this book had just been about a horny teenaged boy trying to come to grips with his raging hormones as he contemplates his probable bisexuality, that would have been cooler. But this book is about a horny teenaged boy trying to come to grips with his raging hormones as he contemplates his probable bisexuality, and by the way, giant insects are taking over the world, starting with his hometown. And damn, is it fantastic.
#2: The Unwanted - Jeffrey Ricker
What I Said: Melding a story about fighting mythological forces, a story about family bonds and reconciliation, and a story of young gay romance is akin to trying to graft wheels onto a dolphin, and yet somehow, Ricker manages to weave them together seamlessly. Jamie must navigate the dangers of both the American high school caste system and of angry gods hurling lightning bolts in his direction, and for that to read as completely natural and realistic is quite the feat.
#3: S. - J.J. Abrams and Doug Dorst
What I Said: The book is crammed with bits of paper, from "newspaper clippings" to postcards to handwritten notes, so the reader is actually reading two books at the same time, with one of them being completely fake. Still with me? It's a tough act to pull off, but Abrams and Dorst do it nimbly, making this one of the most fascinating reading experiences of the year.
#4: The Ocean at the End of the Lane - Neil Gaiman
What I Said: There's a very dreamlike quality to the book, and it's a great example of a modern fairy tale. The interloping demon would be genuinely terrifying to a child, and the Hempstock women are exactly the type of people you'd run to in order to defend your home. It fits very neatly into the Gaiman catalog, and I'd heartily recommend it.
#5: Life After Life - Kate Atkinson
What I Said: As the story unfolds, we see how the small changes in the characters' actions ripple out, affecting not only Ursula, but the people around her. As a character exploration, it's riveting.
And now, for the fully ranked list, with books published in 2014 underlined:
Grasshopper Jungle - Andrew Smith (A)
The Unwanted - Jeffrey Ricker (A)
S. - J.J. Abrams and Doug Dorst (2013) (A-)
The Ocean at the End of the Lane - Neil Gaiman (2013) (B+)
Life After Life - Kate Atkinson (2013) (B+)
Spoiled Brats - Simon Rich (B+)
The Divorce Papers - Susan Rieger (B+)
How to Build a Girl - Caitlin Moran (B+)
When Did You See Her Last? - Lemony Snicket (2013) (B+)
Missouri - Christine Wunnicke (2006/2010) (B+)
The Book of You - Claire Kendal (B)
CivilWarLand in Bad Decline - George Saunders (1996) (B)
Astonish Me - Maggie Shipstead (B)
The Postmortal - Drew Magary (2011) (B)
The Path of Minor Planets - Andrew Sean Greer (2001) (B)
The Humans - Matt Haig (2013) (B)
One More Thing: Stories and Other Stories - B.J. Novak (B)
Shouldn't You Be in School? - Lemony Snicket (B)
Speaking from Among the Bones - Alan Bradley (2013) (B)
Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell - Susanna Clarke (2004) (B)
Arts & Entertainments - Christopher Beha (B)
Book of Ages: The Life and Opinions of Jane Franklin - Jill Lepore (2013) (B)
Mr. Mercedes - Stephen King (B)
File Under: 13 Suspicious Incidents (All the Wrong Questions) - Lemony Snicket (B)
Lexicon - Max Barry (2013) (B-)
The Interestings - Meg Wolitzer (2013) (B-)
Hollow City - Ransom Riggs (B-)
Longbourn - Jo Baker (2013) (B-)
Sisterland - Curtis Sittenfeld (2013) (B-)
Ready, Okay! - Adam Cadre (2000) (B-)
One Last Kiss - Michael W. Cuneo (2012) (C+)
The Lifespan of a Fact - John D'Agata, Jim Fingal (2012) (C+)
The Violinist's Thumb: And Other Lost Tales of Love, War, and Genius, as Written by Our Genetic Code Sam Kean (2012) (C)
From Scratch: Inside the Food Network - Allen Salkin (2013) (C)
The Three - Sarah Lotz (C-)
The Imperfectionists - Tom Rachman (2010) (D+)
And finally, there are the books that don't even get the dignity of a grade. Last year, there were one or two books I didn't get through because issues of my own, rather than anything being wrong with the book itself. Not so this time:
The Execution of Noa P. Singleton - Elizabeth L. Silver: Is it the narrator or the author who's irritatingly in love with the sound of her own voice? Either way, this book got insufferable in a hurry and was punted back to the library.
Founding St. Louis - First City of the New West - J. Frederick Fausz: St. Louis is a fascinating city, but you'd never know it from this book, which is a dry recounting of names and dates. There are ways to make history intriguing, and unfortunately, this isn't it.
Hopefully, the books of 2015 will signal a bounce back in quality, and I'll have more to recommend. Speaking of which, my reading list is almost entirely made up of recommendations from others, so if you've got a Best Of... list of your own, please let me know. Happy reading!
Thirty-six doesn't sound like a lot, but for someone who also consumes a lot of movies, TV, games, and podcasts, averaging three books a month isn't half-bad! Unfortunately, though the number of books went up, the average quality went down. There were definitely some bright spots this year, of course, which we'll get to in a moment. But if we're looking at 2014 as a whole, the books that stand out are fewer and farther between. Note that last year, 13 of the 28 books ranked a B+ or higher (46%). This year, 10 of the 36 managed to make the cut (28%). Ouch.
But hey, let's get to some good news! In looking at my list of books, it becomes increasingly clear how much I enjoy a well-executed gimmick. I wouldn't call myself a huge overall fan of science fiction or fantasy, but books that manage to straddle the line between those and realism always seem to rise to the top. It's our world, but giant bugs are attacking. It's our world, but a hidden Amazon tribe needs our help. It's our world, but a woman keeps looping through her life. If 2013 was the Year of the Short Story, 2014 is the Year of the Parallel Universe. So let's crawl through the looking glass, and talk about which of those worlds are worth the visit.
#1: Grasshopper Jungle - Andrew Smith
What I Said: If this book had just been about a horny teenaged boy trying to come to grips with his raging hormones, that would have been cool. If this book had just been about a horny teenaged boy trying to come to grips with his raging hormones as he contemplates his probable bisexuality, that would have been cooler. But this book is about a horny teenaged boy trying to come to grips with his raging hormones as he contemplates his probable bisexuality, and by the way, giant insects are taking over the world, starting with his hometown. And damn, is it fantastic.
#2: The Unwanted - Jeffrey Ricker
What I Said: Melding a story about fighting mythological forces, a story about family bonds and reconciliation, and a story of young gay romance is akin to trying to graft wheels onto a dolphin, and yet somehow, Ricker manages to weave them together seamlessly. Jamie must navigate the dangers of both the American high school caste system and of angry gods hurling lightning bolts in his direction, and for that to read as completely natural and realistic is quite the feat.
#3: S. - J.J. Abrams and Doug Dorst
What I Said: The book is crammed with bits of paper, from "newspaper clippings" to postcards to handwritten notes, so the reader is actually reading two books at the same time, with one of them being completely fake. Still with me? It's a tough act to pull off, but Abrams and Dorst do it nimbly, making this one of the most fascinating reading experiences of the year.
#4: The Ocean at the End of the Lane - Neil Gaiman
What I Said: There's a very dreamlike quality to the book, and it's a great example of a modern fairy tale. The interloping demon would be genuinely terrifying to a child, and the Hempstock women are exactly the type of people you'd run to in order to defend your home. It fits very neatly into the Gaiman catalog, and I'd heartily recommend it.
#5: Life After Life - Kate Atkinson
What I Said: As the story unfolds, we see how the small changes in the characters' actions ripple out, affecting not only Ursula, but the people around her. As a character exploration, it's riveting.
And now, for the fully ranked list, with books published in 2014 underlined:
Grasshopper Jungle - Andrew Smith (A)
The Unwanted - Jeffrey Ricker (A)
S. - J.J. Abrams and Doug Dorst (2013) (A-)
The Ocean at the End of the Lane - Neil Gaiman (2013) (B+)
Life After Life - Kate Atkinson (2013) (B+)
Spoiled Brats - Simon Rich (B+)
The Divorce Papers - Susan Rieger (B+)
How to Build a Girl - Caitlin Moran (B+)
When Did You See Her Last? - Lemony Snicket (2013) (B+)
Missouri - Christine Wunnicke (2006/2010) (B+)
The Book of You - Claire Kendal (B)
CivilWarLand in Bad Decline - George Saunders (1996) (B)
Astonish Me - Maggie Shipstead (B)
The Postmortal - Drew Magary (2011) (B)
The Path of Minor Planets - Andrew Sean Greer (2001) (B)
The Humans - Matt Haig (2013) (B)
One More Thing: Stories and Other Stories - B.J. Novak (B)
Shouldn't You Be in School? - Lemony Snicket (B)
Speaking from Among the Bones - Alan Bradley (2013) (B)
Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell - Susanna Clarke (2004) (B)
Arts & Entertainments - Christopher Beha (B)
Book of Ages: The Life and Opinions of Jane Franklin - Jill Lepore (2013) (B)
Mr. Mercedes - Stephen King (B)
File Under: 13 Suspicious Incidents (All the Wrong Questions) - Lemony Snicket (B)
Lexicon - Max Barry (2013) (B-)
The Interestings - Meg Wolitzer (2013) (B-)
Hollow City - Ransom Riggs (B-)
Longbourn - Jo Baker (2013) (B-)
Sisterland - Curtis Sittenfeld (2013) (B-)
Ready, Okay! - Adam Cadre (2000) (B-)
One Last Kiss - Michael W. Cuneo (2012) (C+)
The Lifespan of a Fact - John D'Agata, Jim Fingal (2012) (C+)
The Violinist's Thumb: And Other Lost Tales of Love, War, and Genius, as Written by Our Genetic Code Sam Kean (2012) (C)
From Scratch: Inside the Food Network - Allen Salkin (2013) (C)
The Three - Sarah Lotz (C-)
The Imperfectionists - Tom Rachman (2010) (D+)
And finally, there are the books that don't even get the dignity of a grade. Last year, there were one or two books I didn't get through because issues of my own, rather than anything being wrong with the book itself. Not so this time:
The Execution of Noa P. Singleton - Elizabeth L. Silver: Is it the narrator or the author who's irritatingly in love with the sound of her own voice? Either way, this book got insufferable in a hurry and was punted back to the library.
Founding St. Louis - First City of the New West - J. Frederick Fausz: St. Louis is a fascinating city, but you'd never know it from this book, which is a dry recounting of names and dates. There are ways to make history intriguing, and unfortunately, this isn't it.
Hopefully, the books of 2015 will signal a bounce back in quality, and I'll have more to recommend. Speaking of which, my reading list is almost entirely made up of recommendations from others, so if you've got a Best Of... list of your own, please let me know. Happy reading!
The State of the Art: Television 2014
Last year, whittling down the television shows I watched to the top five was pretty simple. It was a good year for TV, but only a handful of shows really blew me away, and it was easy to decide what should get top marks. This year, I'm sitting here agonizing, because I want to put about ten shows into my top five. I've had to make some very painful cuts, but ultimately decided that by pure virtue of their novelty, newer shows are standing out more than shows that have been on the air for a while. All this to say that while I still adore Bob's Burgers, Brooklyn Nine-Nine, and Parks and Recreation, they're taking a bit of a backseat this year so I can sing the praises of shows that managed to capture my heart in their first season, which is a difficult feat to accomplish.
My top five also ignores a lot of critically-acclaimed shows that I'd probably like as much as everyone else, but just haven't had a chance to get to yet. I promise I'll try to watch The Good Wife and The Americans at some point, but unlike all the critics fawning over them, nobody's paying me to sit around watching TV, so I'm working with more limited options here. Older seasons that I'm finally getting to (and loving) aren't eligible, which is a shame, but I have to play fair. Enough caveats, though! Let's get to the list!
#1: Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey - Season 1
Though I just described the difficulty of whittling my list down to a top five, there was never any doubt as to what would take the top spot this year. It's tough enough to make a show entertaining. Making it entertaining, educational, visually arresting, and socially-conscious-without-being-didactic is nigh on impossible. Cosmos could only scratch the surface at explaining the weird and wonderful aspects of our universe and the scientists (both famous and forgotten) responsible for exploring it, but what a scratch. In everything it attempted, it struck a perfect balance. It corrected popular misconceptions without being polemic. It explained advanced scientific concepts in a way that a general viewer could understand without being condescending. It highlighted just how small and insignificant the human race is to the universe while stressing the importance and responsibilities the human race has in the past, present, and future of our own small corner. It was fun and important and gorgeous, and I'm hoping against hope that they produce more episodes. Even if they don't, Cosmos will always stand as the highlight of 2014 television.
#2: Orange is the New Black - Season 2
Even after all that blabber about featuring new shows on my top five this year, I had to make room for this. Far from going through a sophomore slump, Orange is the New Black managed to put out a terrific first season, then proceeded to get even better. I still don't know how a show with so many characters managed to not only make time for everyone, but did so without feeling rushed or bloated. All the characters, no matter how kind or how evil they're initially presented as, are written as real, multifaceted humans with understandable motivations. Every single storyline that took place within the prison's walls was riveting, with special mention going to Morello's backstory, which literally made my jaw drop. A show this immense would usually have a few miscast characters, a few unnecessary plotlines, and a few insufferable scenes. But no. Aside from a little dead weight in the form of characters outside Litchfield, Season 2 was funny, sad, thrilling, and scary. This show is a machine with a thousand moving parts, and in 2014, that machine was firing on all cylinders.
#3: Black-ish - Season 1
There seems to be a theme in this year's list: It's Difficult To Pull Off [Fill-In-The-Blank], But This Show Did So Admirably. It's difficult to present science lectures as entertainment. It's difficult to write for more than twenty believably human characters. Know what else is difficult? It's difficult to handle storylines with racial implications. It's difficult to write kid characters that aren't annoying (or played by annoying actors). It's difficult to balance family and work scenes. And Black-ish came out of nowhere to knock all three of those out of the park. I started watching it out of curiosity, hoping that it'd give me a decent chuckle or two, and instead, it's effortlessly ensconced itself as my favorite sitcom of the year. It can take old saws such as in-law friction and school crushes and make them funny again, but what really shines about this show is its ability to contrast the experiences of its characters with more mainstream (read: white) ones without being self-important about it. Storylines that could be potential landmines, such as tokenism in the office, the morality of spanking, or the justifications of minorities that play Oppression Olympics with other minorities are handled not only gracefully, but hilariously. All four of the kids in this show are good actors who can sell shallowness or smug precociousness without being obnoxious, but the real standout is Tracee Ellis Ross. Sitcom wives are often put-upon killjoys or shrill shrews who are constantly attempting to wrangle a wacky husband and his schemes. In Black-ish, Ross gets to be as wacky and scheming as her husband, and she absolutely shines.
#4: Silicon Valley - Season 1
People spend a lot of time trying to craft funny jokes, but it takes a lot of skill to incorporate dudebro humor into that while still maintaining a show's intelligence. Veer too far into esoteric humor, and you get Dennis Miller's disastrous stint on Monday Night Football. Veer too far into the lowbrow stuff, and you've got Adam Sandler. Silicon Valley managed to be a whip smart show about starting a business in a cutthroat environment, developing emerging technology, and...dick jokes. Nerds are often presented as a monolithic type of archetype, but all of the characters in this show are their own kind of nerd, with unique ways of being socially awkward. The bickering and the collaboration of the characters are all entirely natural, and between the satirization of tech billionaires and scenes of awkwardly trying to alter a sexually explicit company logo, this just might be the smartest comedy that aired in 2014.
#5: Looking - Season 1
Gay characters are starting to improve. Once upon a time, they were non-existent. Then they were allowed onto the screen, but only as sassy accessories for straight women. Then they were allowed to be their own characters, as long as they never did anything as icky as actually displaying affection for each other or - god-forbid - wanted to have sex. Even when gay characters actually had agency, you weren't guaranteed to get a quality show out of it, as the hacky, melodramatic, soft-porny American version Queer As Folk proved. So in a sense, Looking is a revolutionary show; it features gay characters that are actually believably human. As in Orange is the New Black, none of the characters are entirely good or entirely evil. They often have good intentions that are waylaid by fear or temptation. They deal with problems and quirks that affect people in the modern gay dating world. And they have sex! And not with bow-chicka music to a dance club backbeat, but the way real people have it - rolling around in bed in a messy apartment on a Sunday morning. And as I mentioned in the review, though the show is at the bottom of the top five list, "Looking For The Future" (in which two characters simply hang out for a day, and grow closer by talking about their backgrounds and hangups) is probably my favorite individual episode of anything this year.
My top five also ignores a lot of critically-acclaimed shows that I'd probably like as much as everyone else, but just haven't had a chance to get to yet. I promise I'll try to watch The Good Wife and The Americans at some point, but unlike all the critics fawning over them, nobody's paying me to sit around watching TV, so I'm working with more limited options here. Older seasons that I'm finally getting to (and loving) aren't eligible, which is a shame, but I have to play fair. Enough caveats, though! Let's get to the list!
#1: Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey - Season 1
Though I just described the difficulty of whittling my list down to a top five, there was never any doubt as to what would take the top spot this year. It's tough enough to make a show entertaining. Making it entertaining, educational, visually arresting, and socially-conscious-without-being-didactic is nigh on impossible. Cosmos could only scratch the surface at explaining the weird and wonderful aspects of our universe and the scientists (both famous and forgotten) responsible for exploring it, but what a scratch. In everything it attempted, it struck a perfect balance. It corrected popular misconceptions without being polemic. It explained advanced scientific concepts in a way that a general viewer could understand without being condescending. It highlighted just how small and insignificant the human race is to the universe while stressing the importance and responsibilities the human race has in the past, present, and future of our own small corner. It was fun and important and gorgeous, and I'm hoping against hope that they produce more episodes. Even if they don't, Cosmos will always stand as the highlight of 2014 television.
#2: Orange is the New Black - Season 2
Even after all that blabber about featuring new shows on my top five this year, I had to make room for this. Far from going through a sophomore slump, Orange is the New Black managed to put out a terrific first season, then proceeded to get even better. I still don't know how a show with so many characters managed to not only make time for everyone, but did so without feeling rushed or bloated. All the characters, no matter how kind or how evil they're initially presented as, are written as real, multifaceted humans with understandable motivations. Every single storyline that took place within the prison's walls was riveting, with special mention going to Morello's backstory, which literally made my jaw drop. A show this immense would usually have a few miscast characters, a few unnecessary plotlines, and a few insufferable scenes. But no. Aside from a little dead weight in the form of characters outside Litchfield, Season 2 was funny, sad, thrilling, and scary. This show is a machine with a thousand moving parts, and in 2014, that machine was firing on all cylinders.
#3: Black-ish - Season 1
There seems to be a theme in this year's list: It's Difficult To Pull Off [Fill-In-The-Blank], But This Show Did So Admirably. It's difficult to present science lectures as entertainment. It's difficult to write for more than twenty believably human characters. Know what else is difficult? It's difficult to handle storylines with racial implications. It's difficult to write kid characters that aren't annoying (or played by annoying actors). It's difficult to balance family and work scenes. And Black-ish came out of nowhere to knock all three of those out of the park. I started watching it out of curiosity, hoping that it'd give me a decent chuckle or two, and instead, it's effortlessly ensconced itself as my favorite sitcom of the year. It can take old saws such as in-law friction and school crushes and make them funny again, but what really shines about this show is its ability to contrast the experiences of its characters with more mainstream (read: white) ones without being self-important about it. Storylines that could be potential landmines, such as tokenism in the office, the morality of spanking, or the justifications of minorities that play Oppression Olympics with other minorities are handled not only gracefully, but hilariously. All four of the kids in this show are good actors who can sell shallowness or smug precociousness without being obnoxious, but the real standout is Tracee Ellis Ross. Sitcom wives are often put-upon killjoys or shrill shrews who are constantly attempting to wrangle a wacky husband and his schemes. In Black-ish, Ross gets to be as wacky and scheming as her husband, and she absolutely shines.
#4: Silicon Valley - Season 1
People spend a lot of time trying to craft funny jokes, but it takes a lot of skill to incorporate dudebro humor into that while still maintaining a show's intelligence. Veer too far into esoteric humor, and you get Dennis Miller's disastrous stint on Monday Night Football. Veer too far into the lowbrow stuff, and you've got Adam Sandler. Silicon Valley managed to be a whip smart show about starting a business in a cutthroat environment, developing emerging technology, and...dick jokes. Nerds are often presented as a monolithic type of archetype, but all of the characters in this show are their own kind of nerd, with unique ways of being socially awkward. The bickering and the collaboration of the characters are all entirely natural, and between the satirization of tech billionaires and scenes of awkwardly trying to alter a sexually explicit company logo, this just might be the smartest comedy that aired in 2014.
#5: Looking - Season 1
Gay characters are starting to improve. Once upon a time, they were non-existent. Then they were allowed onto the screen, but only as sassy accessories for straight women. Then they were allowed to be their own characters, as long as they never did anything as icky as actually displaying affection for each other or - god-forbid - wanted to have sex. Even when gay characters actually had agency, you weren't guaranteed to get a quality show out of it, as the hacky, melodramatic, soft-porny American version Queer As Folk proved. So in a sense, Looking is a revolutionary show; it features gay characters that are actually believably human. As in Orange is the New Black, none of the characters are entirely good or entirely evil. They often have good intentions that are waylaid by fear or temptation. They deal with problems and quirks that affect people in the modern gay dating world. And they have sex! And not with bow-chicka music to a dance club backbeat, but the way real people have it - rolling around in bed in a messy apartment on a Sunday morning. And as I mentioned in the review, though the show is at the bottom of the top five list, "Looking For The Future" (in which two characters simply hang out for a day, and grow closer by talking about their backgrounds and hangups) is probably my favorite individual episode of anything this year.
Blood Will Out
December is all about catching (and catching up with) movies that are being discussed on year-end lists. There's no way I'll get to everything I want to, but that's no reason not to give it the ol' college try. Going to Kansas City to visit my sister is always a good opportunity to consume some culture, and this past weekend was no exception. We had a Saturday double-feature of Birdman in the theater, then home for The Skeleton Twins on Netflix. And as my sister mentioned on Twitter, if nothing else, "Birdman and the Skeleton Twins" would be a terrific band name.
Now, did you know that there are only two types of entertainment? There's deep, emotionally complex Art, and there's soulless, big-budget dreck. The former is always good, the latter is always terrible, and there's absolutely nothing in between. That's the gist of Birdman, the newest film from director Alejandro González Iñárritu, known for such rollicking good times as Amores Perros and Babel. Michael Keaton stars as an actor who used to be a big name, most notably for playing a costumed superhero, but hasn't been heard from in a while. GET IT? He stakes his reputation and a good amount of his money on a serious play that he's not only producing, but directing and starring in as well. His fears and nerves continually flood to the surface, often in the form of hearing the voice of his Birdman character from long ago. His new attempt at relevance is beset by problems ranging from a surly, distant daughter to a costar who insists that all emotions in the theater be genuine at any cost, whether it's by drinking real alcohol or by nearly raping an actress on stage. His problems mount until inevitably, they explode into violence.
This movie is on everyone's lips as a shoo-in for a Best Picture nomination, and while I didn't dislike it, it doesn't remotely deserve that reputation. It's well-acted (Edward Norton almost walks off with the entire picture) and well-shot, but it doesn't have much to say, story-wise. Journalists and critics are set up as easy strawmen to knock down. American tastes are derided as wholly crass and unsophisticated. It's a shallow criticism of the state of modern culture. While it probably deserves a C+ for those reasons, strong performances and cinematography (the movie is filmed to make large sections of it seem to be one continuous shot, which really works well) elevate it a good deal. It was definitely worth a viewing, but please...no awards.
The Skeleton Twins was interesting, in that it's a drama that features actors better known for comedy. It stars Bill Hader, who plays Milo, a gay, out-of-work actor who comes from a family racked with depression. After a failed relationship, he unsuccessfully attempts suicide, after which he reconnects with his similarly suicidal twin sister Maggie (Kristin Wiig), who he hasn't spoken with in ten years. The two start to rebuild their relationship, while still stumbling over life obstacles that serve as constant temptations to end it all.
It's a heavy premise, but these two actors are adept at injecting levity. They also play really well as siblings. In a way, brother/sister relationships are the most difficult to portray realistically, but you can immediately accept that these two grew up together. Scenes that would come off as trite and cheesy in another drama actually work in this movie. In particular, a scene where Milo tries to cheer up his angry sister by roping her into a Starship lip sync really shines. This film is not the most layered, unflinching depiction of depression and family tension that you'll ever see, but it's better than any suicide drama starring Saturday Night Live alums has any right to be.
Birdman: B-
The Skeleton Twins: B
Now, did you know that there are only two types of entertainment? There's deep, emotionally complex Art, and there's soulless, big-budget dreck. The former is always good, the latter is always terrible, and there's absolutely nothing in between. That's the gist of Birdman, the newest film from director Alejandro González Iñárritu, known for such rollicking good times as Amores Perros and Babel. Michael Keaton stars as an actor who used to be a big name, most notably for playing a costumed superhero, but hasn't been heard from in a while. GET IT? He stakes his reputation and a good amount of his money on a serious play that he's not only producing, but directing and starring in as well. His fears and nerves continually flood to the surface, often in the form of hearing the voice of his Birdman character from long ago. His new attempt at relevance is beset by problems ranging from a surly, distant daughter to a costar who insists that all emotions in the theater be genuine at any cost, whether it's by drinking real alcohol or by nearly raping an actress on stage. His problems mount until inevitably, they explode into violence.
This movie is on everyone's lips as a shoo-in for a Best Picture nomination, and while I didn't dislike it, it doesn't remotely deserve that reputation. It's well-acted (Edward Norton almost walks off with the entire picture) and well-shot, but it doesn't have much to say, story-wise. Journalists and critics are set up as easy strawmen to knock down. American tastes are derided as wholly crass and unsophisticated. It's a shallow criticism of the state of modern culture. While it probably deserves a C+ for those reasons, strong performances and cinematography (the movie is filmed to make large sections of it seem to be one continuous shot, which really works well) elevate it a good deal. It was definitely worth a viewing, but please...no awards.
The Skeleton Twins was interesting, in that it's a drama that features actors better known for comedy. It stars Bill Hader, who plays Milo, a gay, out-of-work actor who comes from a family racked with depression. After a failed relationship, he unsuccessfully attempts suicide, after which he reconnects with his similarly suicidal twin sister Maggie (Kristin Wiig), who he hasn't spoken with in ten years. The two start to rebuild their relationship, while still stumbling over life obstacles that serve as constant temptations to end it all.
It's a heavy premise, but these two actors are adept at injecting levity. They also play really well as siblings. In a way, brother/sister relationships are the most difficult to portray realistically, but you can immediately accept that these two grew up together. Scenes that would come off as trite and cheesy in another drama actually work in this movie. In particular, a scene where Milo tries to cheer up his angry sister by roping her into a Starship lip sync really shines. This film is not the most layered, unflinching depiction of depression and family tension that you'll ever see, but it's better than any suicide drama starring Saturday Night Live alums has any right to be.
Birdman: B-
The Skeleton Twins: B
It's Not TV
For someone who cut cable service several months ago, I haven't done too badly at keeping up with TV shows. Between Netflix, Hulu, and other streaming sites, I can get just about every show I'm interested in. Just about. There are, however, a particular subset of shows that my usual sources can't cover. And for that, I had to resort to...other methods. That opened a whole new avenue of shows, all of them on HBO. I have no idea how long this portal will remain open, so I hurried to jump into everything that I'd been hearing good things about, plowing through the inaugural seasons of four shows that couldn't be much more different in tone:
First up was Veep, which stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as a hapless vice-president whose ambition far outstrips her competence. Her office is full of slackers and schemers, and the group of them is always getting into one embarrassing situation or another. It's a comedy very much in the vein of The Office (minus the invisible film crew), but with higher stakes and the ability to swear. This is the only show of the four that has already been on for more than a season, which also means it's the only show that had expectation built in. People have been falling all over themselves to praise Veep since it started; Louis-Dreyfus has won three consecutive Emmys for it. And while both she and the show are good, it didn't quite live up to the hype for me. That may be because cringe comedy has never been my favorite style. Or it may be genuinely over-praised. Still, it was a funny season, and I'm more than willing to catch up with the rest of the episodes.
Next was Silicon Valley, which is another comedy. This one is about Richard Hendricks, a brilliant but socially inept programmer who develops software that has the potential to change the technological community. Big businesses smell money and come after his idea, but Richard decides to retain control of his idea and builds his own small business with his cantankerous friends. All sorts of challenges rain down on his head, ranging from logos to intellectual espionage. It's actually really rich story material, but the show never gets too heavy, which I liked. It's also got just about the perfect amount of dude humor, which can go overboard in a hurry. Making a simple dick joke can be lazy. Making a dick joke into a full-on mathematical debate is genius.
But enough of things like smiling and good feelings! Let's muck around in some despair! That was easily accomplished by watching True Detective. Take all the critical praise that Veep gets and triple it, and you'd be in the general vicinity of how much attention this show has attracted. It's a depressing, dour show about a brutal murder and the toll it takes on both the community and the two detectives tasked with solving it. Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson both turn in impressive performances, but unfortunately, the tone of this show struck me the same way that another highly-praised, violent drama did. Not to say that True Detective was bad. Some of the technical work that went into it was riveting, and I can recognize what an achievement it is. But I can also recognize when a show is Not For Me, and while I'll probably check out Season 2 to see if it's different enough to grab my attention, I'll likely have to make my peace with being in the minority on this one.
Finally, I zoomed through the first season of Looking, which was pretty easy to do, given how fascinating it was. One of the executive producers is Andrew Haigh, which makes sense, since the show is reminiscent of Weekend extended to series length. It follows the lives of a group of gay friends living in San Francisco. They're all trying to work out what they're looking for, both professionally and personally. None of the characters are purely good or purely bad - they're all saddled with flaws and assets in equal measure. A lot of the storylines are mortifyingly relatable, from app hookups to blurred lines between friends/coworkers/boyfriends. The ground is thick with relationship dramas these days, but there aren't a lot of realistic gay stories being told. This series is a refreshing change of pace, without resorting to the eye-rolling melodrama that Queer As Folk traded in. Though it won't take the top spot on my list of 2014 television shows, there's a real chance that "Looking for the Future" - in which two characters play hooky from work and do nothing more than hang out for the day - will be my favorite individual episode of the year.
Veep - Season 1: B
Silicon Valley - Season 1: A-
True Detective - Season 1: C+
Looking - Season 1: B+
First up was Veep, which stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as a hapless vice-president whose ambition far outstrips her competence. Her office is full of slackers and schemers, and the group of them is always getting into one embarrassing situation or another. It's a comedy very much in the vein of The Office (minus the invisible film crew), but with higher stakes and the ability to swear. This is the only show of the four that has already been on for more than a season, which also means it's the only show that had expectation built in. People have been falling all over themselves to praise Veep since it started; Louis-Dreyfus has won three consecutive Emmys for it. And while both she and the show are good, it didn't quite live up to the hype for me. That may be because cringe comedy has never been my favorite style. Or it may be genuinely over-praised. Still, it was a funny season, and I'm more than willing to catch up with the rest of the episodes.
Next was Silicon Valley, which is another comedy. This one is about Richard Hendricks, a brilliant but socially inept programmer who develops software that has the potential to change the technological community. Big businesses smell money and come after his idea, but Richard decides to retain control of his idea and builds his own small business with his cantankerous friends. All sorts of challenges rain down on his head, ranging from logos to intellectual espionage. It's actually really rich story material, but the show never gets too heavy, which I liked. It's also got just about the perfect amount of dude humor, which can go overboard in a hurry. Making a simple dick joke can be lazy. Making a dick joke into a full-on mathematical debate is genius.
But enough of things like smiling and good feelings! Let's muck around in some despair! That was easily accomplished by watching True Detective. Take all the critical praise that Veep gets and triple it, and you'd be in the general vicinity of how much attention this show has attracted. It's a depressing, dour show about a brutal murder and the toll it takes on both the community and the two detectives tasked with solving it. Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson both turn in impressive performances, but unfortunately, the tone of this show struck me the same way that another highly-praised, violent drama did. Not to say that True Detective was bad. Some of the technical work that went into it was riveting, and I can recognize what an achievement it is. But I can also recognize when a show is Not For Me, and while I'll probably check out Season 2 to see if it's different enough to grab my attention, I'll likely have to make my peace with being in the minority on this one.
Finally, I zoomed through the first season of Looking, which was pretty easy to do, given how fascinating it was. One of the executive producers is Andrew Haigh, which makes sense, since the show is reminiscent of Weekend extended to series length. It follows the lives of a group of gay friends living in San Francisco. They're all trying to work out what they're looking for, both professionally and personally. None of the characters are purely good or purely bad - they're all saddled with flaws and assets in equal measure. A lot of the storylines are mortifyingly relatable, from app hookups to blurred lines between friends/coworkers/boyfriends. The ground is thick with relationship dramas these days, but there aren't a lot of realistic gay stories being told. This series is a refreshing change of pace, without resorting to the eye-rolling melodrama that Queer As Folk traded in. Though it won't take the top spot on my list of 2014 television shows, there's a real chance that "Looking for the Future" - in which two characters play hooky from work and do nothing more than hang out for the day - will be my favorite individual episode of the year.
Veep - Season 1: B
Silicon Valley - Season 1: A-
True Detective - Season 1: C+
Looking - Season 1: B+
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










